תעשייה וניהול 2015

  How Should Care Providers Implement Integrative Practices? Exploratory Study Comparing Diabetes and Mental Health Care

Zhanna Novikov 1 Wiljeana Glover 2 Paula Trepman 3 Eitan Naveh 1 Margalit Goldfracht 4,5
1William Davidson Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
2Technology, Operations, and Information Management Division, Babson College
3School of Medicine, Stanford University
4Quality Improvement Department, Medicine Section, Community Division Headquarters, Clalit Health Services
5Family Health Care, Technion

The improvement of life expectancy among elderly increases the rate of complex and comorbid patients treated in health care systems and the need to provide integrated care. Integration between health care units to achieve common goals has been of interest to health systems because of the potential to reduce cost and improve patient centered care. However, the means by which integrative practices actually influence patient centered care remains unclear. While many studies claim a positive association between implementation of integrative practices and patient centered care, others raise concerns that integrative practices may not necessarily improve patient centered care and increase health systems` expenditures. Given the aging of the population, the aim of this study was to explore the mechanism by which integrative practices influence patient centered care and to suggest a systematic approach for effective integration. We conducted qualitative study comparing diabetes and mental health services through focus groups with 60 staff members from one health maintenance organization (HMO). We identified a five-category framework of integrative practices that each directly and distinctively influences patient centered care. Moreover, our findings suggest that integrative practices influence patient centered care indirectly through creation of interdependent treatment competence, which enables providers to repeatedly deliver interdependent treatment in a flexible and adaptive way. We developed quantitative indicators to support the suggested model. Our findings suggest that more implementation of integrative practices is not necessarily better for patient centered care. Specifically, optimal implementation refers to the collective implementation of different integrative practices and thus encompasses both the extent (i.e. the amount of currently implemented practices out of those considered important to implement) and the extensiveness (i.e. the amount relative to the implementation of other practices), may lead to interdependent treatment competence and higher patient centered care. We suggest a creative measurement method of comparing the relative implementation of integrative practices that may assist managers and policy makers in developing interdependent treatment competence.









Powered by Eventact EMS